Worth watching to the end.

This is not good 5 years to the final meltdown.

This from Page 90:

4 SEC. 134. RECOUPMENT.
5 Upon the expiration of the 5-year period beginning
6 upon the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director
7 of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation
8 with the Director of the Congressional Budget Office, shall
9 submit a report to the Congress on the net amount within
10 the Troubled Asset Relief Program under this Act. In any
11 case where there is a shortfall, the President shall submit
12 a legislative proposal that recoups from the financial in13
dustry an amount equal to the shortfall in order to ensure
14 that the Troubled Asset Relief Program does not add to
15 the deficit or national debt.

Do NOT think for a minute the government is going to recoup in 5 years.. no way no how!

This is true.

This is the truth. Prosecutors in MO have taken it upon themselves to ignore the first amendment, and though this is not their actual advertisement I thought it might make a point.

A must see from start to end.

If you would really like to understand what the hell happened pay close attention and use pause if you must.

A Start.

I propose that the first step in providing liquidity for Fannie, Freddie et al.. is for ALL the candidates who received money for their campaigns should now refund those contributions.

Further it should be done with interest.

The Obama Ayers relationship fleshed out.

I suggest this be seen by anyone who really wants the complete truth about Obama and William Ayers.

http://talkstraight.org/2008/obama-ayers-radical-brothers/

All fact all referenced. Make your own Judgment

Catching Wild Pigs.

The following I copied from a friends site. I am sure he wont mind. I had seen this around before, but find it is even more important today. Feel free to copy and pass along as well.


A chemistry professor in a large college had some exchange students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab the Professor noticed one young man (exchange student) who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt.

The professor asked the young man what was the matter. The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's government and install a new communist government.

In the midst of his story he looked at the professor and asked a strange question. He asked, 'Do you know how to catch wild pigs?'

The professor thought it was a joke, and asked for the punch line. The young man said this was no joke. 'You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come everyday to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming.

When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side. The pigs, who are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat, you slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd.

Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.

The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening to America . The government keeps pushing us toward socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare, medicine, drugs, etc.. While we continually lose our freedoms -- just a little at a time.

One should always remember: There is no such thing as a free lunch! Also, a politician will never provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself.

Also, if you see that all of this wonderful government 'help' is a problem confronting the future of democracy in America , you might want to send this on to your friends.

In this 'very important' election year, listen closely to what the candidates are promising you !!

Just maybe you will be able to tell who is about to slam the gate on America .

'A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.' - Thomas Jefferson

Message Received - NBC plays nice on McCain

Sans than the opening piece (standard fare) shown here, NBC's SNL Completely avoided any skits downplaying, McCain, Palin or any of the Republican figures in this election cycle.



Of course the ENTIRE show did not at all parody O-Who, or anything on the Democrat side of the fence either. Of course there is Nothing funny about (Obama) O-who, and his policy of divisive politics.

Quote of the day..

Sign at his business..

"Voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders" - Bud Gregg insurance guy.

These Videos are WAY too good to miss

Posted on a friends site. Videos YOU MUST SEE Three Videos that are a must see. All are good, but I am truly amazed at the creative genius behind the Lion King Parody.

Truth because it's Published?

-Cross posted from Michigan Taxes Too Much-

Much like the "philosophical" meanderings you would find scratched on the walls of the typical bathroom stall at the airport, bar, restroom at the local elementary school, Daily KOS readers are energized daily with all the truths they need to know. And in the same vein, Air America and its Dozens, or possibly hundreds of listeners are given a dose of Randy Rhodes' version of Sarah Palin's life.

So.. do you believe it? Here is a new Bumper sticker. Click on it to see the full size version if you like.



They must.. we SAID so.

An exercise by Right Michigan's Nick De Leeuw suggests the above Bumper sticker has merit. Or does it? The question of whether people believe many of the lies told to defame those whom they philosophically disagree can be summed up with a recent conversation I had with a very good customer. I should preface this with a statement of fact that I cannot for the life of me SHUT UP when doing my sales gigs. Fortunately I read the writing on the wall and didn't push the issue, and will be a little more careful for the sake of my future business dealings.

ME: "So what do you think about that Palin pick?"

Cust: "Yeah wow no kidding. It's the first time I ever donated to a presidential campaign.."

ME: "Me too, wow what an unbelievable pick.."

Cust: "But the donation wasn't to McCain! That woman is Corrupt and in the pockets of big oil! as well as that apparently she is taking credit for her 17 year old daughter's kid, and fired some guy who was going to expose her..."

Pretty much at that point I knew it was best to pursue a "business only" relationship, as I know that many can become very emotional once they make up their minds on a political issue. It proved to me however, that REALLY DECENT PEOPLE can be taken in by.. CRAP. IT doesn't mean they are stupid, uneducated or even totally politically ignorant. It simply means that in the fight for our thoughts and minds, a well constructed half, or even quarter truth can be made believable by a fine crafter of words such as many who inhabit the liars den known as the KOS.

In the writings here, I can only hope I am able to present the truths as they are best told. If I am wrong in a fact presented, I hope that I am called on it, so that it may be presented properly, and ethically correct. For all of the few readers I have collected, I wish to make it my responsibility to deliver facts fairly and honestly, and hopefully the opinions are easily separated from fact.

Want to Get Pulled Over?

Here you go.. turn this into a bumper sticker and let BIG GOVERNMENT and the FUZZ know exactly how you feel.

Write Now and Write often

I receive Paul Chesser's regular emails, because I like Paul feel we have gone a little off the deep end in the reaction to a perceived climate change (global warming) threat. Below is a following letter cut and pasted so many others can also write in objection to proposed rules that will COST ALL OF US:

I imagine that most of you are aware that EPA is considering whether to regulate carbon emissions under the Clean Air Act, and has declared in advance of that decision that they have begun the period of time known in federal legalese as the Advanced Notice for Proposed Rule making (ANPR). So right now is the opportunity for anyone in the public to submit comments that will be collected by the agency and analyzed and addressed. The EPA expects more comments on this proposed rule than any other in the history of the CAA. So without question they will receive thousands of comments from folks on all sides of the issue, and it is vitally important that the perspectives from sound science, sound economics, limited and constitutional government, and freedom be heard.

Below are some basic guidelines should you wish to submit your own views. The deadline is Nov. 28. If EPA decides to regulate CO2 under the CAA, almost nothing will be off-limits from the regulatory powers they have with no legislative, executive or judicial constraints. So be heard!

- Paul

How to Comment on the EPA’s Proposed Rules on Regulating Carbon Dioxide:

· Email: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov (Note your e-mail address will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet)

• Fax: 202-566-9744
  

· Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
· Online: Go here <http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&o=09000064806a0cfd> and click on the yellow bubble next to “Add Comments”.

*** Comments must be received on or by November 28, 2008 and direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0318***

Suggested Topics to Address:

• the expense of the regulations on Americans, such as gas prices, food prices, transportation costs, and manufactured goods will increase, and regular Americans will be placed in a situation where they have to carefully monitor their own greenhouse gas emissions in order to comply with the confusing EPA regulations.
• the impact on businesses, who will be forced to pay massive energy taxes.
• the impact on small businesses, who are less able to absorb the higher costs of energy, transportation, and goods, and who are less equip to deal with the legal red tape of complying with such regulations.
• job losses resulting from the higher energy and compliance costs of new regulatory excess.
• reduced international competitiveness as we impose a massive new regulatory burden on domestic manufacturers—a burden that foreign producers can ignore.
• the imposition of EPA permits on Americans who happen to use lawncare equipment such as lawnmowers, own large homes, or own as few as 25 dairy cows
• the imposition of yet another hurdle to entrepreneurs who want to start new businesses.
  

Background Information:

• The link <http://www.epa.gov/epahome/pdf/anpr20080711.pdf> to the proposed regulations
• EPA’s website <http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/anpr.html> on the regulations
• The U.S. Chamber website <http://www.uschamber.com/co2/default> , with a wide array of links and documents relevant to the regulations
• A White House Policy Memorandum <http://www.uschamber.com/NR/rdonlyres/evxzau5oxvpbtqsvhey2f7wvqhjrz55vkvfhep7rs32pz2uzpjwoynngng5xzn6hssotmfsdnt2i5ktffknuxwiiu2d/WHPolicyMemoonEPAANPR.pdf> on the impact of the EPA rule-making
• Other Cabinet responses <http://www.uschamber.com/NR/rdonlyres/e6d4nwwqe754lrgtb6uthffdyrqtkwanvw6zycdxjiihmazcrkw4c7zcrusvunbddkz6nzjhfroib4amfzuvyy6dfig/CabinetResponsestoEPA.pdf> to the regulations
• A condensed fact-sheet <http://www.uschamber.com/NR/rdonlyres/euwq46u6e2rezqofi3l6cubaz7jyi47g3zmujuoy4qr46vp6rxkr7gr2ooeqfaas4wnwn2rkzlj6zknt44wdnqsxxif/081408reONEPAGERexpandedfactsheetonANPR.pdf> on the regulations
• A WSJ piece <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121642309337666613.html> on the growing jurisdiction of the EPA
  

Other things to know:

· EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
· The www.regulations.gov website is an “anonymous access” system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet.
· For additional information about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

Our friends in Canada Get it.

Though I am not entirely happy about the white elephant Canada had given the USA in Jennifer Granholm, I do find myself fascinated on occasion of the clarity in which some of the objective thinkers north of the border can analyze what is happening here.

A small quoted segment of a Canada Free Press article:

Not only has the Democrat Party left us vulnerable to other oil producing nations, but its ethanol agenda has created vast imbalances in the world’s food supplies as corn is diverted from domestic use and as a factor in our agricultural exports.

If you had heard Sen. Reid, a man who has said, “Oil makes us sick. Coal makes us sick. Global warming makes us sick,” you would have heard him attack oil as the reason for all the woes of the world. “President Carter warned us about it in the 1970s when he proposed real solutions—conservation, fuel efficiency, and alternative fuels—to what he correctly named the ‘moral equivalent of war.’” President Carter, whose weak response to the taking of U.S. diplomats hostage by the Iranian Revolution led to the election of Ronald Reagan, was wrong then and he is wrong now.

While we allow the Democrats in this country to lay blame on "oil connections" to the white house, we need to think back on Carter's screw up in the 70s which nearly stopped ALL the motors, and DID cause a slow down in this country. It has been the Democrats costing this nation, and dearly.

Thank GOD for free press anywhere.

"Trees" lyrics drive home a point

Rush (one of my all time favorite groups) wrote this song many years ago, yet has meaning which never rang truer than today.

"The Trees"

There is unrest in the forest
There is trouble with the trees
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas

The trouble with the maples
(And they're quite convinced they're right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light
But the oaks can't help their feelings
If they like the way they're made
And they wonder why the maples
Can't be happy in their shade

There is trouble in the forest
And the creatures all have fled
As the maples scream 'Oppression!'
And the oaks just shake their heads

So the maples formed a union
And demanded equal rights
'The oaks are just too greedy
We will make them give us light'
Now there's no more oak oppression
For they passed a noble law
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe and saw

When I was a teenager, I recognized the meaning in the song, and will point out to this day that Socialism (today's Liberals and Democrats) is nothing, but that which keeps us at the LOWEST common denominator through the hammer of government.